Legal Opinion

Seven Lakes Reservoir Co. v. Majors

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 7, 1921No. 9694PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action for damages to land occasioned by defendants running water through plaintiff’s property. Judgment for plaintiff. Error to the District Court of Larimer County, Hon. Robert G. Strong, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

The suit is by Sarah T. Majors to recover for the destruction of and damage to her land, occasioned by defendants running a large volume of water into and through Dry Creek, a natural channel which crosses her property. Plaintiff had judgment for $2,750.00, and defendants bring the record here for review on error. The parties are referred to as they appeared below.

In 1906 the Seven Lakes company and one B. D. Sanborn, predecessor in interest of the defendant the Boyd Lake company, began to divert water from the Lake Loveland reservoir through Dry Creek to other of their reservoirs for storage…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. United States v. Great Falls Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Powers v. City of Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  5. Northern Pacific Railroad v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hoery v. United StatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. Ossman v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  3. City of Tupelo, Mississippi v. John Patterson (Pat) O'CallaghanMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Hankins v. BorlandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. State, Department of Health v. the MillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API