Legal Opinion
State of Minnesota v. United States Steel Corporation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 15, 1969No. 4-68 Civ. 37, 4-68 Civ. 36, 4-68 Civ. 38, 4-68 Civ. 41, 3-68 Civ. 34, 3-68 Civ. 37, 3-68 Civ. 39PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
These private antitrust actions are brought by four States and (originally) four other governmental agencies for treble damages under the Sherman and Clayton Acts against six structural steel fabricating companies. The complaint alleges that the six defendants conspired to fix prices within the States of Minnesota, Wisconsin, North Dakota and South Dakota in the structural steel fabricating industry and that the defendants allocated contracts and business among themselves. It is alleged generally that the defendants sold structural steel at unduly inflated and…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Cascade Natural Gas Corp. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of West Virginia v. Chas. Pfizer & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970
- Jack Malamud v. Sinclair Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- Philadelphia Housing Authority v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1970
- The State of Minnesota v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.