Legal Opinion
The State of Minnesota v. United States Steel Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 24, 1971No. 20184_1PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
These civil antitrust actions come to us on interlocutory appeal under 28 U. S.C.A. § 1292(b). The suits arise out of an alleged conspiracy to fix prices in the sale of structural steel to plaintiff states for use in bridges on the interstate highway systems. 1 The cases were consolidated as class actions in the District of Minnesota.
In the course of pretrial discovery defendants served on all of the plaintiffs certain interrogatories pertaining to the role of the federal government and its financial involvement with the various states under the Federal-Aid Highway Act, 23…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Minnesota v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Mason-Rust, a Joint Venture v. Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Local 42Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lunsford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Jack Malamud v. Sinclair Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Western Liquid Asphalt Cases. State of Alaska v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- Yoder Bros. v. California-Florida Plant Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Gweldon Lee Paschall v. Kansas City Star Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.