Legal Opinion

Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Centaur Film Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 8, 1914No. 727PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by the Motion Picture Patents Company against the Centaur Film Company. On motions by complainant for preliminary injunction and by defendant to dismiss.

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

Letters patent No. 589,168 were granted on August 31, 1897, to Thomas A. Edison, for certain improvements in kinetoscopes. Later, on June 10, 1902, application was made for the reissue of said letters patent No. 589,168 in two divisions, the application alleging that by reason of a defective or insufficient specification, or by reason of said Thomas A. Edison claiming as his invention more than he had1' a right to claim, the original letters patent were inoperative; and on September 30, 1902, letters patent 12,037 and 12,-*248038 were issued to Edison. Letters patent…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Thomson v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Clark v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Consolidated Safety-Valve Co. v. Crosby Steam Gauge & Valve Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fulton Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  2. The BannerDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1915
  3. Fulton Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API