Legal Opinion
Fulton Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1927No. 4490, 4491Published
1Opinion of the Court
17 F.2d 1006 (1927)
FULTON CO.
v.
BISHOP & BABCOCK CO.
BISHOP & BABCOCK CO.
v.
FULTON CO.
Nos. 4490, 4491.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
March 8, 1927.
Rehearing Denied March 18, 1927.
L. H. Sutton, of Washington, D. C. (W. B. Kerkam, of Washington, D. C., Bates, Macklin, Goldrick & Teare, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Mauro, Cameron, Lewis & Kerkam, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant and cross-appellee.
H. B. Fay and John F. Oberlin, both of Cleveland, Ohio (J. B. Fay, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Allen & Allen, of Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee and cross-appellant.
Before…
Also in this document: Per curiam 1; Per curiam 2.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Elliott-Fisher Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
- American Diamond Rock Boring Co. v. SheldonUnited States Circuit Court · 1880
- Fulton Co. v. Bishop & Babcock Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- Toledo Mower & Reaper Co. v. Johnston Harvester Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.