Legal Opinion
State v. Heisinger
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 22, 1977No. 11967, 11968PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZASTROW, Justice (on reassignment).
On April 30, 1976, the defendants, Eugene Heisinger and Loren Schmidt, were charged with the rape of a fifteen-year-old *901female in violation of SDCL 22-22-1.1 A preliminary hearing was held on May 14, 1976, and the defendants were bound over for trial. The state filed an information and the defendants responded with motions to set aside and demurrers. An intermediate appeal was granted to determine whether the trial court erred in ruling that the presumption contained within SDCL 22-22-1(2) (hereinafter “the presumption”) is conclusive, and whether, based…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Hartpence v. Youth Forestry CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Delano v. PetteysSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. LodermeierSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Farmland Insurance Companies of Des Moines v. HeitmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.