Legal Opinion

Daniel Ross Umphlet v. Harry Connick, District Attorney

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1987No. 86-3089PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge:

This appeal presents a challenge to the constitutionality of Louisiana’s “B-girl” statute. This statute provides that:

No person holding a retail [alcohol] dealer’s permit and no agent, associate, employee, representative, or servant of any such person shall do or permit any of the following acts to be done on or about the licensed premises: (8) Employ or permit females, commonly known as B girls, to solicit patrons for drinks and to accept drinks from patrons and receive therefor any commission or remuneration in any other way. 1

The plaintiffs are Daniel Umphlet, owner…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Billy Kirk Pruitt v. Levi Strauss & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. United States v. Frank Lafayette BirdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. Society of Separationists, Inc. v. Guy Herman, Judge of the Travis County Court at LawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Walnut Properties, Inc. v. City of WhittierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API