Legal Opinion

Walnut Properties, Inc. v. City of Whittier

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 9, 1988No. Nos. 86-5645, 87-5748, 87-5859 and 87-5956PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

In this action, Walnut Properties, Inc. (“Walnut”) challenges the constitutionality of a municipal zoning ordinance which regulates the location of adult businesses. The city of Whittier, California (“City”) adopted an ordinance prohibiting, among other things, the location of adult businesses within 1,000 feet of a church. Walnut’s adult “Pussycat” Theater violates that provision. At issue is whether enforcement of the ordinance would deprive Walnut of its First Amendment rights. This case also involves issues of abstention and immunity. We affirm the district court’s…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Davis v. SchererSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Heidi Baker Evan Baker, a Minor by and Through His Guardian Ad Litem, Heidi Baker v. I.G. Racansky Mavis KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Columbia Basin Apartment Ass'n v. City of PascoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Colacurcio v. City of KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API