United States v. Jay Vee Wanless, A/K/A William Earl Wanless, Douglass Scott Tompkins, Linda Aune, and Michael Eugene Beck
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Fouiv "appellants challenge the district court’s denial of a motion to suppress certain evidence obtained through inventory and investigatory searches of two automobiles. The appellants contend that because the police did not inform the owner of the vehicles that he did not have to consent to the inventory search, the evidence resulting from the search should have been suppressed. They also contend that the remaining evidence was insufficient to establish probable cause to allow the police to search the two vehicles. We agree.1
FACTS2
After being alerted by an air…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dunaway v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Nathaniel James v. Robert G. Borg, Warden Attorney General of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Peter John CormierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. George M. Khoury, Howard Kluver, David W. West, Louis H. ChippasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Kevin C. ReillyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court · 1994
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.