Legal Opinion

Konetzny v. Konetzny

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided February 16, 1945No. 786Published

1Opinion of the Court

Crumlish, J.,

This is a petition for additional counsel fees, alimony pendente lite, costs and expenses* filed by respondent wife against libellant husband, who instituted an action for divorce on the grounds of desertion and indignities to the person. The traditional and munificent sum of $35 has been awarded to counsel for respondent.

The petition avers that as a result of the institution of this proceeding respondent, in order to maintain a defense thereto, was compelled to retain counsel. Such counsel filed a rule for a bill of particulars, a rule for counsel fees, and an answer to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brong v. BrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Karmany v. KarmanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Tumini v. TuminiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Koehler v. KoehlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Homler v. HomlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API