Karmany v. Karmany
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 66, Oct. T., 1918, by complainant, from order of C. P. Lebanon Co., September T., 1908, No. 176, refusing to modify a decree for alimony in divorce in case of Lincoln Karmany v. Helen I. Karmany. Petition to modify decree for alimony. Before HENRY, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court below entered the following order: “And now, to wit, December 27,1917, the prayer of the petitioner is refused.”
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 66, Oct. T., 1918, by complainant, from order of C. P. Lebanon Co., September T., 1908, No. 176, refusing to modify a decree for alimony in divorce in case of Lincoln Karmany v. Helen I. Karmany. Petition to modify decree for alimony. Before HENRY, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court below entered the following order: “And now, to wit, December 27,1917, the prayer of the petitioner is refused.” Error assigned, among others, was the order of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, P. J.,
After securing a' verdict, the libelant was granted a divorce from the respondent, upon the grounds of cruel and barbarous treatment, etc., by a decree of the court below, on December 24, 1909, and was ordered to pay alimony to the appellee, which without complaint or objection he made thereunder until January 1, 1917, when he presented a petition for a modification of the decree as to the amount of alimony to be paid. The decree made by the court is stated to have been “with the consent of the complainant to pay alimony to the respondent at the rate of $175 per month,…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Brong v. BrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Hooks v. HooksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Albrecht v. AlbrechtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Homler v. HomlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Ray v. RaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.