Legal Opinion

Tumini v. Tumini

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1942No. Appeal, 91PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hirt, J.,

Opinion by

The parties were married on October 2,1937. Because of the conduct of respondent there was a complete severance of all marital relations and family life some time prior to April 9, 1939. Since that date both of the parties, though occupying separate quarters, have continued to live in a house owned by libellant. A divorce was granted libellant on the charge of indignities. The decree will be affirmed.

The parties, both of Italian extraction, are past middle life. The libellant though a citizen for 25 years does not speak English fluently; the respondent apparently considers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brong v. BrongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Hepworth v. HepworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Doemling v. DoemlingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Cunningham v. CunninghamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Homler v. HomlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hanson v. HansonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. McCormick v. McCormickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Fullwood v. FullwoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Seery v. SeerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Kobryn v. KobrynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API