Legal Opinion

Homler v. Homler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 29, 1935No. Appeal, 346PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jambs, J.,

Libellant filed her libel for divorce a mensa et thoro, alleging wilful and malicious desertion, cruel and barbarous treatment and indignities to the person so as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome, to which respondent filed an answer denying all of the alleged causes. Libellant then presented a petition for alimony and counsel fees upon which, after hearing, the court made an order of $15 per month as alimony pendente lite and $125 as counsel fees and expenses, from which order this appeal was taken.

Appellant complains that because the libellant is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Karmany v. KarmanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Cunningham v. CunninghamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Ray v. RaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Wm. Meinel v. Jennie MeinelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wechsler v. WechslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Orr v. OrrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Tumini v. TuminiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Gangloff v. GangloffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Morgan v. MorganSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API