Legal Opinion

Maxwell v. Woodall

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 5, 2014No. 20130136-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTIANSEN, Judge:

[ 1 Plaintiff Natalie Maxwell appeals from the district court's award of attorney fees in favor of James H. Woodall. We affirm.

T2 On April 2, 2012, Maxwell filed a declaratory-judgment action against Woodall, claiming that Woodall had attempted to conduct an unauthorized nonjudicial foreclosure of her property. Maxwell's complaint alleged that pursuant to Utah Code section 57-1-21, Woodall was an unqualified trustee who did not have the legal authority to conduct a sale of Maxwell's property. In response, Woodall moved to dismiss Maxwell's complaint, arguing that he was a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In re EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Barnard v. WassermannUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Griffith v. GriffithUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Central Utah Water Conservancy District v. KingUtah Supreme Court · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cougar Canyon Loan, LLC v. Cypress Fund, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
  2. Ross v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API