Griffith v. Griffith
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
¶ 1 We granted Janna Griffith’s (“Janna”) petition for a writ of certiorari to review the Utah Court of Appeals’ decision in her case. Janna argues that the court of appeals erred in affirming the trial court’s: (i) grant of rule 11 sanctions; (ii) attorney fees award to her husband, David Griffith (“David”), based on Judge Rokich’s recusal; (iii) assessment of David’s income for purposes of alimony and child support; (iv) alimony award; (v) property distribution; and (vi) decision that each party should be responsible for their remaining attorney fees. We will address the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Butterfield v. OkuboUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- In re EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1913
- Barnard v. WassermannUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Barnard v. SutliffUtah Supreme Court · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Wilson v. IHC Hospitals, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
- Ashby v. AshbyUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- Featherstone v. SchaerrerUtah Supreme Court · 2001
- Goggin v. GogginUtah Supreme Court · 2013
- Morse v. PackerUtah Supreme Court · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.