Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Wassermann

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1993No. 920259PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Plaintiff Brian Barnard, a Utah attorney, claims that he was sanctioned inappropriately for failing to properly represent his client, Frank Randazzo, in a divorce proceeding and for failing to notify his client of the court’s prior rulings in the divorce. Barnard sued his client’s ex-wife, her attorney, and the judge presiding over the divorce. He appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of the judge and dismissal of the claim against his client’s ex-wife. We affirm both orders.

FACTS

Ms. Randazzo brought suit against her ex-husband, Barnard’s client, seeking contempt…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Petrowski v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Gables at Sterling Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Castlewood-Sterling Vill. I, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. A.S. v. R.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2017

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API