Barnard v. Wassermann
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Plaintiff Brian Barnard, a Utah attorney, claims that he was sanctioned inappropriately for failing to properly represent his client, Frank Randazzo, in a divorce proceeding and for failing to notify his client of the court’s prior rulings in the divorce. Barnard sued his client’s ex-wife, her attorney, and the judge presiding over the divorce. He appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of the judge and dismissal of the claim against his client’s ex-wife. We affirm both orders.
FACTS
Ms. Randazzo brought suit against her ex-husband, Barnard’s client, seeking contempt…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- St. Benedict's Development Co. v. St. Benedict's HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- Petrowski v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Jau-Fei Chen v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 2004
- Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Gables at Sterling Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Castlewood-Sterling Vill. I, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2018
- Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- A.S. v. R.S.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.