Legal Opinion

Pile v. McCoy

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

PROM SULLIVAN. Appeal from Chancery Court of Sullivan County. Hugh G. Kyle, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

Complainant and defendant were co-sureties of W. A. Sparger, guardian of Fanny D. Clark. The guardian made default, and judgment was rendered against him and his sureties for $1,450.62. Pile paid the whole of the judgment, and this bill is to recover from McCoy the entire amount thus paid. The Chancellor gave complainant decree for one-half the amount paid, but denied any further relief, and the complainant appealed, and assigned as error that he was not allowed judgment for the’ full amount paid by him.

The- Court of Chancery Appeals heard the case, and reversed the decree of the Chancellor,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brantingham v. BeasleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926
  2. Henry King & Co. v. Arnett Bros.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API