Legal Opinion

Quint v. McMullen

California Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1894No. 18334PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Glenn County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action to quiet title, and the complaint is in the usual form. The answer denies that the defendant claims, or has at any time claimed, to have or to own any estate or interest in the land, and avers that he claims nothing as to said land, except as disclosed by the following facts. He thereupon alleges that said lands are situated within the boundaries of Central Irrigation District, and that said district is a public corporation. He further alleges in detail all the *382steps and proceedings leading up to, and including, the sale of the aforesaid land to the defendant, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Walsh v. WallaceNevada Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Spencer v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Corridan v. RoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Danielson v. StokesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API