Legal Opinion
Danielson v. Stokes
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 20, 1963No. Civ. 26485PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
George E. Danielson, Walter M. Campbell, and Thomas T. Johnson (appellants) were awarded a summary judgment on their claim for attorneys’ fees aris ing out of their representation of Jack G. Fisher. Appellants object on appeal to the decision made by the trial court as to the source of payment of their claim. Respondents are various other claimants of proceeds of the policy of life insurance which is the subject of the main action.
In October 1958 Jack G. Fisher contracted to sell his interest in a construction business to Houston Fred Stokes. Stokes agreed to pay $100,000 for the business and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Estate of ColtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Maxwell Hardware Co. v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Spencer v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Ruben v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Quint v. McMullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. West Coast Shows, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Ferraro v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
- Leaf v. Phil Rauch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Farmers Insurance Group v. Worth Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Nevada County Office of Education v. RilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.