Legal Opinion

Spencer v. Nelson

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1947No. S. F. 17439PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Defendants and respondents have filed motions to dismiss two appeals, both taken by plaintiff and appellant, from an order granting a new trial and from the judgment.

The action was brought for declaratory relief to ascertain the validity and effect of a written agreement. After trial by the court, judgment was entered in favor of defendants, determining that the instrument was invalid. Plaintiff sought to attack this adverse judgment both by motion for new trial and by appeal, as hereinafter appears.

Plaintiff’s motion for new trial was in the usual form, and one of the grounds set forth was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mountain Tunnel Gravel Mining Co. v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Quint v. McMullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Puckhaber v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Jackson v. DolanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ferraro v. Pacific Finance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Pease v. Beech Aircraft Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Berge v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Beavers v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API