Legal Opinion

Manning v. Loidhamer

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 30, 1975No. 2756-1PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Denney, J. *

This is an appeal by the State of Washington from the dismissal of its cross claim for indemnity, including attorney’s fees and costs.

Plaintiffs Manning, Schuster, O’Bryan, and Bullard brought actions for damages against defendants Loidhamer, doing business as United Transfer Company (hereinafter called United), David Goninan, driver of United’s truck, Peter Kainz, driver of the family car of defendants Donald M. Kainz and wife, and the State of Washington. The case proceeded to trial against all defendants. After 5 days of trial, a settlement was effected between plaintiffs…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Armstrong Construction Co. v. ThomsonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Wells v. Aetna InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Tradewell Group, Inc. v. MavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  2. Haner v. Quincy Farm Chemicals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Hartwig Farms, Inc. v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  4. North Pacific Plywood, Inc. v. Access Road Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  5. Rogerson Hiller Corp. v. Port of Port AngelesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API