Legal Opinion

Wriggelsworth v. Lott

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1943No. Docket No. 20, Calendar No. 42,252PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note. The case was tried before the court sitting as a jury.

The following facts are not in dispute. On May 19, 1919, defendant, Floyd E. Lott, signed a promissory note in the amount of $675 payable to plaintiff, John Wriggelsworth, the due date of which was September 19, 1919. The following indorsement is found upon the note: “No.v. 26, 1935. Received to apply $25.” The record shows that of the $25 payment indorsed on the note, $17.92 was for cement purchased from defendant and the balance $7.08 was in the form of a check dated November 26, 1935, but…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McFadden v. FollrathSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Born v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cheltenham Stone & Gravel Co. v. Gates Iron WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Bradford v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Philadelphia Life Ins. v. HayworthCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bartleman v. HumphreySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. GarbuttMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Modern Engineering & Service Corp. v. McCreaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API