Legal Opinion

Born v. First National Bank

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1890No. 14,102PublishedCited by 29 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

On the 30th day of January, 1886, the appellant was indebted to the appellee, and, after twelve o’clock, noon, of that day, he delivered to it a certified-check drawn by him on Ritzinger’s bank, in which bank he then had money on deposit. The banks of the city of Indianapolis had a long established rule requiring all checks presented after twelve o’clock, noon, to be certified by the bank upon which they were drawn, and it was the well-known custom of such banks to immediately charge the checks certified by them against the depositor. This was done in this instance, and the amount of the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Hancock v. YadenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. First Nat. Bank of Jersey City v. . LeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  4. Espy v. Bank of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Bickford v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Scheffenacker v. HoopesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. Larry D. Jones and Sandra L. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Dille v. WhiteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. Deal v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. Minot v. RussMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API