Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. Garbutt

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1985No. Docket 76930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P.J.

This is an action on a promissory note made by defendant Robert Garbutt and payable to Tri-City Bank of Warren, Michigan, plaintiff FDIC’s predecessor in interest. Following a bench trial in Livingston Circuit Court, a judgment in plaintiff’s favor for $11,300 plus 12% statutory interest was entered. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied on February 17, 1984. Defendant appeals as of right and plaintiff has filed a cross-appeal.

Defendant is an industrial and architectural designer. On August 2, 1974, he signed a promissory note in the amount of $12,800 payable to TriCity Bank 90 days…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Trail Clinic, Pc v. BlochMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. Tito Castro Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Yeiter v. Knights of St Casimir Aid SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance v. BerganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Fisher Sand & Gravel Co. v. Neal a Sweebe, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2013
  5. PNC Bank, National Association, successor by merger to National City Bank, a national banking association v. Legal Advocacy, P.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API