Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Life Ins. v. Hayworth

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 5, 1924No. 2121PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error was defendant below; and the defendant in error, the plaintiff, and they will be so styled here. , The plaintiff, Sarah K. Hayworth, is the widow of John B. Hayworth and was the beneficiary named in a policy upon his life issued by the defendant, the Philadelphia Life Insurance Company. By its terms, the defendant bound itself to pay $6,000 if the insured died from bodily injuries caused solely by external, violent and accidental causes and $3,000 if death came in any other way, except by suicide, in which excepted case there was to be no liability…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Thompson v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Iowa Life Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Conway v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Wastun v. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. of Ft. Wayne, Ind.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Cleve v. Craven Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  5. Hayworth v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API