Philadelphia Life Ins. v. Hayworth
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was defendant below; and the defendant in error, the plaintiff, and they will be so styled here. , The plaintiff, Sarah K. Hayworth, is the widow of John B. Hayworth and was the beneficiary named in a policy upon his life issued by the defendant, the Philadelphia Life Insurance Company. By its terms, the defendant bound itself to pay $6,000 if the insured died from bodily injuries caused solely by external, violent and accidental causes and $3,000 if death came in any other way, except by suicide, in which excepted case there was to be no liability…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Thompson v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Iowa Life Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Conway v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Wastun v. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. of Ft. Wayne, Ind.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Cleve v. Craven Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- Hayworth v. Philadelphia Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.