Legal Opinion

Lilley-Ames Company, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 19, 1961No. 214-58PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JONES, Chief Judge.

This is a contract action. The plaintiff contracted to produce and deliver barrack bags for the defendant. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant furnished it with defective material whereby the plaintiff sustained costs in excess of its bid price. The plaintiff brings this suit to recover that alleged excess.

The facts of this case are as follows. On April 6, 1953, the Armed Services Textile and Apparel Procurement Agency, Departments of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, issued an invitation for bids for the manufacture and delivery of olive drab denim barrack bags to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chain Belt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  2. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
  3. Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. Christensen Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. James A. Boyajian, Assignee of Triumph Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  2. G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Williamsburg Drapery Co. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. K E C O Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  5. W. H. Edwards Engineering Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API