Legal Opinion
Gedek v. Perez
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 17, 2014No. Nos. 12-CV-6051L, 12-CV-6056L, 12-CV-6067L, 12-CV-6071L, 12-CV-6078L, 12-CV-6080L, 12-CV-6146LPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
DAVID G. LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
These seven cases, which have been consolidated for all purposes under Rule 42(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, *371have been brought by participants and beneficiaries of the Savings and Investment Plan (“SIP”) of Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”) and the Eastman Kodak Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) (collectively “the Plans”), against the administrators and fiduciaries of the Plans.
Plaintiffs allege that the Plans are subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., and that…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. Ex Rel. Saint Vincent Catholic Medical Centers Retirement Plan v. Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Moench v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rinehart ex rel. Buzzo v. Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- In re Lehman Bros. Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- In re Citigroup Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Trustees of the Upstate New York Engineers Pension Fund v. Ivy Asset ManagementDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Pledger v. Reliance Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.