Legal Opinion

Swamp Land Reclamation Dist. No. 341 v. Blumenberg

California Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1909No. Sac. No. 1656PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiff moved in the court below for judgment in its favor upon the pleadings. The motion was granted and judgment was rendered accordingly. This is an appeal from that judgment. The action was begun under the provisions of section 3466 of the Political Code, to foreclose the lien of a swamp land assessment. It is admitted that the assessment was in all respects regularly made and that it was levied for work to be thereafter performed by the district. The only question presented is whether or not the facts set up in the answer constitute a defense to the enforcement of the assessment.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lower Kings River Reclamation District, No. 531 v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pells v. People ex rel. HolmgrainIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Church v. People ex rel. KocherspergerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Gage v. People ex rel. RaymondIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Young v. People ex rel. RaymondIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spurrier v. Reclamation District No. 17California Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Haga v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Payne v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API