Legal Opinion

Haga v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, District Judge.

— Upon rehearing, the original opinion herein is withdrawn and the following substituted as the opinion of the court.

Eespondent is the owner of 320 acres in appellant irrigation district. Eighty acres of respondent’s land are watered by appellant district with what is known as “Ridenbaugh water,” and no controversy exists with regard to the same. The balance, 240 acres, is irrigated from the Boise project of the United States Reclamation Service and from waste water.

In October, 1914, the district, without the consent of respondent, entered into a contract with the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Board of Directors of Modesto Irrigation District v. TregeaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Knowles v. New Sweden Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. People ex rel. Vaughn v. WelchIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. PetrieIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Minidoka Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API