Lower Kings River Reclamation District, No. 531 v. Phillips
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. M. K. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion rendered in Department One.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
After a careful examination of the original arguments of counsel, and of the petition for a rehearing, and also the briefs in Reclamation Dist. 307 v. Glide, one of which contains an elaborate review of the opinion rendered in Department, I am convinced that the judgment ordered and the opinion rendered should stand.
*310The point upon which the rehearing was asked was that the conclusion in Department, that “ the court erred in excluding the evidence tending to prove that defendants’ land was not benefited by the reclamation works, and was arbitrarily and excessively assessed without regard to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Spencer v. MerchantSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Lent v. TillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. HagarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Patten v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In re Organization & of the Bonds of the Central Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Scilley v. Red Lodge-Rosebud Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Roby v. Shunganunga Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Argyle v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.