Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Hotchkin Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 12, 1935PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

The plaintiff seeks in this action of contract to recover the purchase price of shares of stock in a corporation bought by him from the defendant in 1928. The case *79was submitted to the trial judge upon facts agreed upon by the parties and upon testimony as to the ownership of the stock when tendered. The trial judge made findings of fact and rulings of law. The plaintiff presented requests for rulings of law, two of which were granted and the others denied. The case comes before us on the plaintiff’s exceptions to the “rulings and findings” made by the trial judge.

The material facts are in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. DiLorenzo v. Atlantic National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Green v. KempMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  4. Myers v. MeinrathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  5. Bowditch v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Levy v. BendetsonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978
  2. Commissioner of Banks v. Chase Securities Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. Edmund Wright Ginsberg Corp. v. C. D. Kepner Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Norwood Trust Co. v. Twenty-Four Federal Street Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Doherty v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API