Legal Opinion
Edmund Wright Ginsberg Corp. v. C. D. Kepner Leather Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 5, 1945PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHonan, J.
This is an action of contract to recover $10,077.62 with interest arising from the sales of leather made by the defendant during September, 1937, as selling agent of the Murray Leather Company, a copartnership, hereinafter called Murray, which sum the plaintiff alleged was due to it. The defendant filed an answer and also a declaration in set-off for $10,000 which it alleged was owed to it by Murray. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $13,369.98 and for the plaintiff on the defendant’s declaration in set-off. The case is here on various exceptions of the defendant.
The…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Universal Adjustment Corp. v. Midland Bank, Ltd., of LondonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Rizzo v. CunninghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Johnson-Foster Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Atwood v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Bray v. HickmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sherman v. EMPLOYERS'LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORP. LTD.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
- Shayeb v. HollandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Quality Finance Co. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- High Voltage Engineering Corporation v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.