Legal Opinion

Dwyer v. Rothman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 1981No. 55PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and dismissing an amended complaint without leave to amend. The action is against an individual and a corporation; both filed preliminary objections. The lower court dismissed the corporation’s objections, and the propriety of that order is not before us. The lower court explained its order sustaining the individual’s objections by saying that the complaint and amended complaint “reveal that he [the individual] was acting in a representative capacity . . . .” slip op. at 1. We have…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. PAPIEVES Et Ux. v. KellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Bata v. Central-Penn Nat. Bank of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Burton v. BolandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Montgomery County ex rel. Becker v. Merscorp, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Leprino Foods Co. v. Gress Poultry, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Diekman v. Wrightstown TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Feingold v. Hill, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API