Legal Opinion
Diekman v. Wrightstown Township
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 6, 1982No. Appeal, No. 63 T.D. 1981PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
The Bucks County Common Pleas Court sustained the preliminary objections of Bucks County and certain named Commissioners. Fred W. Diekman, by his guardian, appeals. We .affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
Diekman, who was injured1 in an accident on a state road within Bucks County, alleged liability on the part of the County for negligent design, maintenance, repair and posting of traffic signs.
*247The trial court sustained the County’s preliminary objection's, concluding that exclusive jurisdiction for the maintenance and control of state highways…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gekas v. ShappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Rinaldi v. GiblinCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Swank v. Bensalem TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Calvanese v. LEISTCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Associates of Philipsburg v. HurwitzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Powell v. Wrightstown TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Francart v. Smith, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1989
- Hauser v. Borough of Lehighton, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County1985