Legal Opinion

Baskett v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1939No. 27608. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This cause is presented to us solely on respondents’ motion to strike the statement of facts, dismiss the appeal, and affirm the judgment. The matter was argued on a regular motion day and thereafter was assigned for opinion, with leave to respective counsel to file additional briefs on the question. Since that time, supplemental briefs have been submitted by both parties.

The original action was brought by respondents herein, husband and wife, to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the husband. Upon the trial, the jury returned a verdict in respondents’ favor. Motion for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Estill v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Simmons v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Taylor v. AndresWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In Re Byam's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State ex rel. Miller v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Heinz v. Blagen Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Falk v. StienbackWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Loutsis v. GeorgesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Rosencrans v. PurrierWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Davis v. GibbsWashington Supreme Court · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API