Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Andres

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1915No. 12189PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Pemberton, J., entered October 31, 1913, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to recover damages for breach of a written contract. After the issues were framed, the cause was tried to the court and a jury. A verdict was returned in the sum of $800. The defendants thereupon interposed a motion for a new trial upon various grounds. Upon hearing this motion, the court directed that a new trial would be granted unless the plaintiff should elect to remit from the verdict the sum of $200. The plaintiff thereupon filed his election to accept a judgment for $600. The motion in other respects was denied. A judgment was entered in favor of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Miller v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Kirby v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Northern Life Insurance v. WalkerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Simmons v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Baskett v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Deller v. LongWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Loutsis v. GeorgesWashington Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API