Legal Opinion

Falk v. Stienback

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1948No. 30206PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiffs, Iner and Loretta F. Falk, husband and wife, instituted this action against defendants, E. E. and Aileen A. Stienback, husband and wife, asking for judgment for damages suffered by plaintiffs as the result of a collision between plaintiffs’ automobile, driven by Iner Falk, in which plaintiff Loretta F. Falk was a passenger, and defendants’ automobile, driven by Aileen A. Stienback. The accident occurred September 17, 1940, and plaintiffs’ complaint was filed March 10, 1941.

Defendants’ answer to the complaint was filed June 16, 1941, the defendants denying any negligence on their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Whittaker v. WellerWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Baskett v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Keyes v. AhrenstedtWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Loutsis v. GeorgesWashington Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Capers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Palin v. General Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Pierce County v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  4. In Re Anderson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Capers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API