Legal Opinion

McCorvey v. Utah State Department of Transportation

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1993No. 910054, 910069 and 910084PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Justice:

This is a consolidated appeal from a jury verdict entered in favor of plaintiff Daniel B. McCorvey in a personal injury action brought against the Utah Department of Transportation (“UDOT”) and LeGrand Johnson Construction Company (“Le-Grand”).1 We affirm.

I. FACTS

“Where evidence is in conflict in a jury trial, we assume that the jury believed those facts that support its verdict, and we view the facts and the reasonable inferences that arise from those facts in a light most supportive of the jury’s verdict.”2 We recite the facts accordingly.

On August 7, 1986, McCorvey was…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Crookston v. Fire Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. CopelandUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Ong International (U.S.A.) Inc. v. 11th Avenue Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bott v. DeLandUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lyon v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Child v. GondaUtah Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Laney v. Fairview CityUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Hart v. Salt Lake County CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1997

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API