Legal Opinion

Laney v. Fairview City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 2002No. 981729PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

¶ 1 This case addresses whether Utah Code Ann. § 63-30-2(4)(a) (Supp.2000) violates article I, section 11, the “open courts” clause, of the Utah Constitution. The district court held that Fairview City (the City) is immune from suit for its alleged negligence under the Utah Governmental Immunity Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 63-30-1 to -38 (1997 & Supp.2000).1 We hold that the 1987 amendment, declaring all acts of municipalities to be governmental functions, is unconstitutional as applied to municipalities operating electrical power systems. We reverse the summary judgment of…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Evangelical United Brethren Church v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Eldridge v. JohndrowUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State ex rel. K.F. v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Youngblood v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. American Bush v. City of South Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API