Legal Opinion
Barrows v. J.C. Penney Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 13, 2000No. AC 18473PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The named plaintiff, Beverlee Barrows,2 appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after a jury verdict in her favor in the amount of $2000. She claims that the court improperly (1) refused to set aside the jury verdict of $1000 for past economic damages and $1000 for past noneconomic damages, (2) *227allowed the defendants’3 expert to testify to opinions that were not disclosed in accordance with Practice Book § 13-4 (4), and (3) admitted evidence that was not specially pleaded by the defendants pursuant to Practice Book § 10-50. We affirm the judgment of the trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Pawlinski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Marchetti v. RamirezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Grondin v. CuriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Daigle v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- DeEsso v. LitzieConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Bennett v. ChenaultConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Cockayne v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.