State, Dept. of Admin. v. Schallock
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Justice.
The state filed an action seeking a declaration that it had no duty to defend or indemnify Allen Heinze, the former executive director of the Arizona Prosecuting Attorneys Advisory Council, in two cases seeking damages for sexual harassment. The state argued indemnification was not available in either case because Heinze’s acts were not in the course and scope of employment. On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court ruled that the state must indemnify Heinze. The court of appeals reversed, granting summary judgment in favor of the state. See State v.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barbara J. HENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF DUNDEE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Sharon Karibian v. Columbia University, John Borden, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees v. Mark Urban, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Lucille R. Kauffman v. Allied Signal, Inc., Autolite DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Rosemary J. Martin v. Cavalier Hotel Corporation, and Daniel P. Batchelor, Rosemary J. Martin v. Cavalier Hotel Corporation Daniel P. BatchelorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Hughes v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- Craig v. M & O AGENCIES, INC.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Zsigo v. Hurley Medical CenterMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Garcia v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.