Thompson v. Michigan Cab Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
The sole and controlling question in this appeal arises out of the trial judge’s refusal to direct the jury to return a verdict for the defendants on their claim that plaintiff’s driver was guilty of negligence as a matter of law, or to grant defendants’ motion for a judgment non obstante veredicto.
Plaintiff recovered a verdict for $850 for injuries suffered by her in an automobile collision at the in tersection of North Jenison and West Michigan avenues in the city of Lansing, between the hours of 2 and 3 a. m. on January 29, 1935. Neither of these streets was a through highway but “slow”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Flynn v. KramerMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Bugbee v. FowleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Adams v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Schneider v. PomervilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
- Sweet v. RingwelskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Davis v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Clark v. ShefferlyMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.