Hall v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
*204CARTER, J.,
Dissenting. — I dissent.
The majority opinion is contrary to every concept of fairness and good faith. If a similar situation were presented in which an individual or private entity rather than a municipal corporation were involved it would be unhesitatingly held that there had been a substantial compliance, or that the defendant was estopped to assert the insufficiency of the claim, or that there was a waiver of the alleged defect therein. Surely a government agency should be at least as much bound, if not more, than an individual by the requirements of equity, justice and fair…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cawthorn v. City of HoustonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Kelso v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Uttley v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Bowles v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.