Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hall v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1941No. L. A. 17952Published

1Dissent

*204CARTER, J.,

Dissenting. — I dissent.

The majority opinion is contrary to every concept of fairness and good faith. If a similar situation were presented in which an individual or private entity rather than a municipal corporation were involved it would be unhesitatingly held that there had been a substantial compliance, or that the defendant was estopped to assert the insufficiency of the claim, or that there was a waiver of the alleged defect therein. Surely a government agency should be at least as much bound, if not more, than an individual by the requirements of equity, justice and fair…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Cawthorn v. City of HoustonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  2. Sandstoe v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Kelso v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Uttley v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Bowles v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API