Legal Opinion

New York Central Rd. v. City of Bucyrus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1933No. 23796PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

In the course of the opinion, the Ohio Central Railroad Company will be alluded to as the “railroad company,” which was the initial company that was party to the original agreement. Said village of Bucyrus has since become, and is now, a city.

We do not think it necessary to allude to the proceedings under which the railroad company’s title and possession of the premises later came into the hands of the plaintiff in error, for the reason that the village, now the city, of Bucyrus, was not a party to such proceedings and was in no wise bound thereby. The city of Bucyrus relies upon the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Beasley v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Cole v. La GrangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. Blanchard v. Detroit, Lansing & Lake Michigan RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cleveland Trust Co. v. ElbrechtOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hoffman Candy & Ice Cream Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Felch v. Findlay CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Gvozdanovic v. Woodford CorporationOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Bush v. HagueOhio Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API