Legal Opinion

Gvozdanovic v. Woodford Corporation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 2000No. T.C. No. A-9603841, C.A. Nos. C-990574, C-990586PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Painter, Judge.

Ohio has no settled law concerning how a cooperative housing association should remove a tenant/shareholder when the shareholder has breached the lease. We attempt here to resolve the issue. In doing so, we have written rather more than is our custom, and stated the facts in more detail, because we believe it necessary in this unusual case.

This case involves the deteriorating relationship between a corporation and one of its shareholders under a cooperative housing arrangement. A cooperative is neither a freehold nor a condominium. It is a “multi-unit dwelling in which each…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Smiddy v. Wedding Party, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meehan v. MardisOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Cincinnati Metropolitan Housing Authority v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Mary Ann Bender v. Village of MariemontCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API