Legal Opinion

City & County of SF v. All Persons Interested in Matter of Prop. G

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 2021No. A160659Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 7/26/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Plaintiff and Respondent, A160659 v. (City & County of San Francisco ALL PERSONS INTERESTED IN Super. Ct. No. CGC-18-569987) THE MATTER OF PROPOSITION G, Defendants and Appellants. Proposition 13 and Proposition 218 amended the California Constitution to require that any special tax adopted by a local government entity take effect only if approved by a two-thirds vote of the electorate. We recently interpreted these constitutional…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Stanson v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API