Legal Opinion

Palmer v. . Bagg

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 26, 1874PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action is upon a bond of indemnity which, after reciting that the plaintiffs had appointed one Frederick H. Fanning the general agent to sell and dispose of their sewing machines, was conditioned that the said Fanning should account for and pay over the proceeds of sales, etc. Afterward, Fanning took in two partners, one of whom retired in a few months, and the business was continued by Fanning and the other partner during the time the account accrued. The referee found that the sewing machines were delivered to the firm, and were to be paid or accounted for by them. If this finding is…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dupee v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Page v. White Sewing Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Standard Oil Co. v. ArnestadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  4. White Sewing Machine Co. v. HinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Spokane Union Stockyards Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API