Standard Oil Co. v. Arnestad
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Cass County; McConnell, J. Action by the Standard Oil Company against Mike Arnestad and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtCorliss, J.
The object of this suit is to hold the defendants, as sureties upon a bond, liable for the embezzlement of one of the principals in such obligation. The Standard Oil Company, the plaintiff herein, having selected as it agents at Mayville, in this *256state, the firm of Arnestad & Eggerud, required of them a bond with sureties as a condition of shipping them its goods, to be handled by them as such agents at that point. In response to this demand the bond in suit was executed by the firm, and by defendants Hanson and Gullicks as sureties. The sole question before us relates to the liability of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Crane Co. v. SpechtNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Birch v. De RiveraNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- White Sewing Machine Co. v. HinesMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Penoyer v. WatsonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
- Palmer v. . BaggNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. George E. Breece Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Spokane Union Stockyards Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
- Friendly v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Shuttee v. Coalgate Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Trovatten v. MineaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.