Legal Opinion

Rudolph v. Smith

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1903No. 2303PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Teller County.

1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell, J.

December 16, 1895, appellant and appellee entered into a copartnership for the purpose of carrying on a general second hand business at Cripple Creek. Dissentions having arisen, March 18, 1897, the partners had an accounting, a settlement of accounts and a dissolution of the copartnership. Oc*497tober 19, 1899, appellant filed Ms complaint in the-district court, wherein he alleged that since the accounting and settlement above mentioned an examination of the books of the copartnership (which had been wholly kept by and were under the control of the appellee) disclosed that “either through error,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rutter v. ShumwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Jordan v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  3. Burnell v. WachtelColorado Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. Old v. KeenerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  5. Cox v. SargentColorado Court of Appeals · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bowling v. ChambersColorado Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Carlin v. FreemanColorado Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Heinricy v. RichartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Bowling v. ChambersColorado Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Van Buskirk v. BalchColorado Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API