Legal Opinion

Burnell v. Wachtel

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1894PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Pitkin County.

1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.

Iu this case we are asked to say that the court erred in *557rendering final judgment against the appellants. The cause was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury. No exception to the judgment is preserved in the record. It is true,that in the order allowing the appeal it is stated that an exception was taken, but the entry of that statement was the unauthorized act of the clerk, and constitutes no part of the record. Exceptions to the rulings and decisions of the court can be brought into the record only by bill of exceptions, allowed, signed and sealed by the judge. Where a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rutter v. ShumwaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  2. Breen v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
  3. Rocky Mountain Nat. Bank v. McCaskillSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jerome v. BohmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  2. Rudolph v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. Goldsmith v. NewhouseColorado Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Persse v. GaffneyColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Solomon v. SalyColorado Court of Appeals · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API